GRI Content Index
- Home
- ESG Policy and Management System
- ESG Reporting
- GRI Content Index
GRI Content Index
This table can be scrolled sideways.
Statement of use | Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. has reported the information cited in this GRI content index for the period June 1, 2023 to May 31, 2024 in accordance with the GRI Standards. |
---|---|
GRI 1 used | GRI 1: Foundation 2021 |
This table can be scrolled sideways.
GRI STANDARD / OTHER SOURCE | DISCLOSURE | REQUIREMENTS | LOCATION | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
General disclosures | |||||
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 | 2-1 | Organizational details | ▼ | ||
a. | report its legal name | Corporate Profile>Overview | |||
b. | report its nature of ownership and legal form | Corporate Profile>Overview | |||
c. | report the location of its headquarters | Corporate Profile>Overview | |||
d. | report its countries of operation | Corporate Profile>Overview | |||
2-2 | Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting | ▼ | NPR is the only entity subject to financial statements. | ||
a. | list all its entities included in its sustainability reporting | ||||
b. | if the organization has audited consolidated financial statements or financial information filed on public record, specify the differences between the list of entities included in its financial reporting and the list included in its sustainability reporting | ||||
c. | if the organization consists of multiple entities, explain the approach used for consolidating the information, including: | ||||
i. | whether the approach involves adjustments to information for minority interests | ||||
ii. | how the approach takes into account mergers, acquisitions, and disposal of entities or parts of entities | ||||
iii. | whether and how the approach differs across the disclosures in this Standard and across material topics | ||||
2-3 | Reporting period, frequency and contact point | ▼ | |||
a. | specify the reporting period for, and the frequency of, its sustainability reporting | ESG REPORTING>INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ON ESG | |||
b. | specify the reporting period for its financial reporting and, if it does not align with the period for its sustainability reporting, explain the reason for this |
【Japanese only】Securities Report>Calculation period (FP ended May 2024) 【Japanese only】Securities Report>Calculation period (FP ended Nov. 2023) |
|||
c. | report the publication date of the report or reported information | In principle, the Sustainability Report covers two business periods from June 1 to May 31 of the following year, and is published on the website once a year around October. However, the timing of financial and other reports may differ according to the regulations of each report. | |||
d. | specify the contact point for questions about the report or reported information | ESG REPORTING>CONTACT | |||
2-4 | Restatements of information | ▼ | There are no restatements of information. | ||
a. | report restatements of information made from previous reporting periods and explain | ||||
i. | the reasons for the restatements | ||||
ii. | the effect of the restatements | ||||
2-5 | External assurance | ▼ | |||
a. | describe its policy and practice for seeking external assurance, including whether and how the highest governance body and senior executives are involved | ESG REPORTING>External Assurance | |||
b. | if the organization’s sustainability reporting has been externally assured | ||||
i. | provide a link or reference to the external assurance report(s) or assurance statement(s) | ESG REPORTING>External Assurance | |||
ii. | describe what has been assured and on what basis, including the assurance standards used, the level of assurance obtained, and any limitations of the assurance process | ESG REPORTING>External Assurance | |||
iii. | describe the relationship between the organization and the assurance provider | ESG REPORTING>External Assurance | |||
2-6 | Activities, value chain and other business relationships | ▼ | |||
a. | report the sector(s) in which it is active | Investment Strategies>Our Investment Criteria, Portfolio Strategy | |||
b. | describe its value chain, including | ||||
i. | the organization’s activities, products, services, and markets served | Investment Strategies>Our Investment Criteria, Portfolio Strategy | |||
ii. | the organization’s supply chain | Investment Strategies>Our Investment Criteria, Portfolio Strategy | |||
iii. | the entities downstream from the organization and their activities | Investment Strategies>Our Investment Criteria, Portfolio Strategy | |||
c. | report other relevant business relationships | Full sponsor support from the Prologis Group | |||
d. | describe significant changes in 2-6-a, 2-6-b, and 2-6-c compared to the previous reporting period | There are no significant changes. | |||
2-7 | Employees | ▼ | Investment corporations are prohibited from hiring employees under the Japanese Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, and the employees of Prologis REIT Management K.K., to which the asset management is outsourced, are responsible for their operations. | ||
a. | report the total number of employees, and a breakdown of this total by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
b. | report the total number of | ||||
i. | permanent employees, and a breakdown by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
ii. | temporary employees, and a breakdown by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
iii. | non-guaranteed hours employees, and a breakdown by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
iv. | full-time employees, and a breakdown by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
v. | part-time employees, and a breakdown by gender and by region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
c. | describe the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data, including whether the numbers are reported | ||||
i. | in head count, full-time equivalent (FTE), or using another methodology | The report is based on head count. | |||
ii. | at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology | The data is compiled by calendar year. | |||
d. | report contextual information necessary to understand the data reported under 2-7-a and 2-7-b | There is no required background information. | |||
e. | describe significant fluctuations in the number of employees during the reporting period and between reporting periods | There are no material changes. | |||
2-8 | Workers who are not employees | ▼ | |||
a. | report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization and describe | Investment corporations are prohibited from hiring employees under the Japanese Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, and the employees of Prologis REIT Management K.K., to which the asset management is outsourced, are responsible for their operations. | |||
i. | the most common types of worker and their contractual relationship with the organization | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
ii. | the type of work they perform | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
b. | describe the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data, including whether the number of workers who are not employees is reported | ||||
i. | in head count, full-time equivalent (FTE), or using another methodology | The report is based on head count. | |||
ii. | at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology | The data is compiled by calendar year. | |||
c. | describe significant fluctuations in the number of workers who are not employees during the reporting period and between reporting periods | There are no material changes. | |||
2-9 | Governance structure and composition | ▼ | |||
a. | describe its governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>NPR’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | |||
b. | list the committees of the highest governance body that are responsible for decisionmaking on and overseeing the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
c. | describe the composition of the highest governance body and its committees by | ||||
i. | executive and non-executive members | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors | |||
ii. | independence | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
iii. | tenure of members on the governance body | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
iv. | number of other significant positions and commitments held by each member, and the nature of the commitments | Corporate Profile>Board of Directors | |||
v. | gender | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors | |||
vi. | under-represented social groups | Information unavailable | |||
vii. | competencies relevant to the impacts of the organization | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors | |||
viii. | stakeholder representation | Information unavailable | |||
2-10 | Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>NPR’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | |||
b. | describe the criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members, including whether and how the following are taken into consideration | ||||
i. | views of stakeholders (including shareholders) | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>General Meeting of Unit Holders | |||
ii. | diversity | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Commitment to Board Diversity | |||
iii. | independence | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
iv. | competencies relevant to the impacts of the organization | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Commitment to Board Diversity | |||
2-11 | Chair of the highest governance body | ▼ | |||
a. | report whether the chair of the highest governance body is also a senior executive in the organization |
【Japanese only】Articles of Incorporation>Chapter 4 (Directors and the Board) CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors |
|||
b. | if the chair is also a senior executive, explain their function within the organization’s management, the reasons for this arrangement, and how conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors | |||
2-12 | Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the role of the highest governance body and of senior executives in developing, approving, and updating the organization’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies, and goals related to sustainable development | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
b. | describe the role of the highest governance body in overseeing the organization’s due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including | ||||
i. | whether and how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support these processes | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
ii. | how the highest governance body considers the outcomes of these processes | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
c. | describe the role of the highest governance body in reviewing the effectiveness of the organization’s processes as described in 2-12-b, and report the frequency of this review | Of the ESG initiatives discussed and examined by the ESG Committee, the effectiveness of the process is confirmed in the decision-making process of NPR's Board of Directors, as the Board is the final decision-making body for all ESG initiatives related to NPR's investment strategy. | |||
2-13 | Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | describe how the highest governance body delegates responsibility for managing the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including | ||||
i. | whether it has appointed any senior executives with responsibility for the management of impacts | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
ii. | whether it has delegated responsibility for the management of impacts to other employees | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
b. | describe the process and frequency for senior executives or other employees to report back to the highest governance body on the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. | Of the ESG initiatives discussed and examined by the ESG Committee, the effectiveness of the process is confirmed in the decision-making process of NPR's Board of Directors, as the Board is the final decision-making body for all ESG initiatives related to NPR's investment strategy. | |||
2-14 | Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | ▼ | |||
a. | report whether the highest governance body is responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organization’s material topics, and if so, describe the process for reviewing and approving the information | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>Materiality Assessment | |||
b. | if the highest governance body is not responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organization’s material topics, explain the reason for this. | NPR's Board of Directors examines and approves the proposals related to sustainability reporting. | |||
2-15 | Conflicts of interest | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the processes for the highest governance body to ensure that conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated | COMPLIANCE>RULES REGARDING RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS | |||
b. | report whether conflicts of interest are disclosed to stakeholders, including, at a minimum, conflicts of interest relating to | COMPLIANCE>RULES REGARDING RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS | |||
i. | cross-board membership | 【Japanese only】Report on the Management System, etc. of the Issuer of Real Estate Investment Trust Securities, etc.>2. Management System, etc. of the Investment Corporation and the Asset Management Company | |||
ii. | cross-shareholding with suppliers and other stakeholders | 【Japanese only】Securities Report>2. Restrictions on Transactions with Interested Parties>(1) Restrictions based on laws and regulations | |||
iii. | existence of controlling shareholders | Capitalization & Major Unit Holders>Major Unit Holders | |||
iv. | related parties, their relationships, transactions, and outstanding balances | 【Japanese only】Securities Report>2. Restrictions on Transactions with Interested Parties>(3) Transactions with Interested Parties | |||
2-16 | Communication of critical concerns | ▼ | |||
a. | describe whether and how critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body | COMPLIANCE>Compliance Promotion System | |||
b. | report the total number and the nature of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period | There were no significant concerns during the reporting period. | |||
2-17 | Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | ▼ | |||
a. | report measures taken to advance the collective knowledge, skills, and experience of the highest governance body on sustainable development | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Board of Directors | |||
2-18 | Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the processes for evaluating the performance of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Evaluation of the Effectiveness of NPR's Board of Directors | |||
b. | report whether the evaluations are independent or not, and the frequency of the evaluations | NPR conducts annual self-evaluation of the effectiveness of its Board of Directors by each director. | |||
c. | describe actions taken in response to the evaluations, including changes to the composition of the highest governance body and organizational practices. | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Evaluation of the Effectiveness of NPR's Board of Directors | |||
2-19 | Remuneration policies | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives, including | ||||
i. | fixed pay and variable pay | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
ii. | sign-on bonuses or recruitment incentive payments | Information unavailable | |||
iii. | termination payments | Information unavailable | |||
iv. | clawbacks | Information unavailable | |||
v. | retirement benefits | Information unavailable | |||
b. | describe how the remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives relate to their objectives and performance in relation to the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people | Information unavailable | |||
2-20 | Process to determine remuneration | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the process for designing its remuneration policies and for determining remuneration, including | ||||
i. | whether independent highest governance body members or an independent remuneration committee oversees the process for determining remuneration | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
ii. | how the views of stakeholders (including shareholders) regarding remuneration are sought and taken into consideration | Our articles of incorporation, which is set forth by resolutions at general meetings of our unit holders, defines that the maximum amount of remuneration for the Executive Director is ¥1,000,000 per month and the maximum amount of remuneration for the Supervisory Directors is ¥500,000 per month per person. The Board of Directors is responsible for determining an actual amount of compensation for the Executive Director and the Supervisory Directors in light of macroeconomic environment of Japan and general wage levels of Japanese labors. | |||
iii. | whether remuneration consultants are involved in determining remuneration and, if so, whether they are independent of the organization, its highest governance body and senior executives | No compensation consultants are involved. | |||
b. | report the results of votes of stakeholders (including shareholders) on remuneration policies and proposals, if applicable | Not applicable | |||
2-21 | Annual total compensation ratio | ▼ | |||
a. | report the ratio of the annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees(excluding the highest-paid individual); | Report unavailable at present. | |||
b. | report the ratio of the percentage increase in annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual to the median percentage increase in annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual); | Report unavailable at present. | |||
c. | report contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | Report unavailable at present. | |||
2-22 | Statement on sustainable development strategy | ▼ | |||
a. | report a statement from the highest governance body or most senior executive of the organization about the relevance of sustainable development to the organization and its strategy for contributing to sustainable development | TOP COMMITMENT | |||
2-23 | Policy commitments | ▼ | |||
a. | describe its policy commitments for responsible business conduct, including | ||||
i. | the authoritative intergovernmental instruments that the commitments reference | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
ii. | whether the commitments stipulate conducting due diligence | Not applicable | |||
iii. | whether the commitments stipulate applying the precautionary principle | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
iv. | whether the commitments stipulate respecting human rights | HUMAN RIGHTS>HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENT | |||
b. | describe its specific policy commitment to respect human rights, including: | ||||
i. | the internationally recognized human rights that the commitment covers | PROLOGIS HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY | |||
ii. | the categories of stakeholders, including at-risk or vulnerable groups, that the organization gives particular attention to in the commitment | PROLOGIS HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY | |||
c. | provide links to the policy commitments if publicly available, or, if the policy commitments are not publicly available, explain the reason for this | PROLOGIS HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY | |||
d. | report the level at which each of the policy commitments was approved within the organization, including whether this is the most senior level | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
e. | report the extent to which the policy commitments apply to the organization’s activities and to its business relationships | HUMAN RIGHTS>HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENT | |||
f. | describe how the policy commitments are communicated to workers, business partners, and other relevant parties | HUMAN RIGHTS>HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENT | |||
2-24 | Embedding policy commitments | ▼ | |||
a. | describe how it embeds each of its policy commitments for responsible business conduct throughout its activities and business relationships, including | ||||
i. | how it allocates responsibility to implement the commitments across different levels within the organization | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
ii. | how it integrates the commitments into organizational strategies, operational policies, and operational procedures | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
iii. | how it implements its commitments with and through its business relationships |
COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT FOR BUSINESS PARTNERS |
|||
iv. | training that the organization provides on implementing the commitments | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
2-25 | Processes to remediate negative impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | describe its commitments to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts that the organization identifies it has caused or contributed to | COMPLIANCE>SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
b. | describe its approach to identify and address grievances, including the grievance mechanisms that the organization has established or participates in | COMPLIANCE>SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
c. | describe other processes by which the organization provides for or cooperates in the remediation of negative impacts that it identifies it has caused or contributed to | Not applicable | |||
d. | describe how the stakeholders who are the intended users of the grievance mechanisms are involved in the design, review, operation, and improvement of these mechanisms | COMPLIANCE>SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
e. | describe how the organization tracks the effectiveness of the grievance mechanisms and other remediation processes, and report examples of their effectiveness, including stakeholder feedback | Not applicable | |||
2-26 | Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the mechanisms for individuals to | ||||
i. | seek advice on implementing the organization’s policies and practices for responsible business conduct | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT, WHISTLE-BLOWER SYSTEM IN THE PROLOGIS GROUP | |||
ii. | raise concerns about the organization’s business conduct | COMPLIANCE>WHISTLE-BLOWER SYSTEM IN THE PROLOGIS GROUP, SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
2-27 | Compliance with laws and regulations | ▼ | |||
a. | report the total number of significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period, and a breakdown of this total by | ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE | |||
i. | instances for which fines were incurred | Not applicable | |||
ii. | instances for which non-monetary sanctions were incurred | Not applicable | |||
b. | report the total number and the monetary value of fines for instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations that were paid during the reporting period, and a breakdown of this total by | ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE | |||
i. | fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period | Not applicable | |||
ii. | fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in previous reporting periods | Not applicable | |||
c. | describe the significant instances of non-compliance | Not applicable | |||
d. | describe how it has determined significant instances of non-compliance | Not applicable | |||
2-28 | Membership associations | ▼ | |||
a. | report industry associations, other membership associations, and national or international advocacy organizations in which it participates in a significant role |
FOR THE LOGISTICS INDUSTRY AND URBAN REDEVELOPMENT>RELATIONSHIP WITH TRADE ASSOCIATIONS ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE |
|||
2-29 | Approach to stakeholder engagement | ▼ | |||
a. | describe its approach to engaging with stakeholders, including | ||||
i. | the categories of stakeholders it engages with, and how they are identified | RESPONSIBILITY FOR STAKEHOLDERS | |||
ii. | the purpose of the stakeholder engagement; | RESPONSIBILITY FOR STAKEHOLDERS | |||
iii. | how the organization seeks to ensure meaningful engagement with stakeholders | RESPONSIBILITY FOR STAKEHOLDERS | |||
2-30 | Collective bargaining agreements | ▼ | Investment corporations are prohibited from hiring employees under the Japanese Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, and the employees of Prologis REIT Management K.K., to which the asset management is outsourced, are responsible for their operations. | ||
a. | report the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements | 100% of employees are covered by collective agreements. | |||
b. | for employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, report whether the organization determines their working conditions and terms of employment based on collective bargaining agreements that cover its other employees or based on collective bargaining agreements from other organizations | Report unavailable at present. | |||
Material topics | |||||
GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | 3-1 | Process to determine material topics | ▼ | ||
a. | describe the process it has followed to determine its material topics, including | ||||
i. | how it has identified actual and potential, negative and positive impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including impacts on their human rights, across its activities and business relationships | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>Materiality Assessment | |||
ii. | how it has prioritized the impacts for reporting based on their significance | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>Materiality Assessment | |||
b. | specify the stakeholders and experts whose views have informed the process of determining its material topics | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>Materiality Assessment | |||
3-2 | List of material topics | ▼ | |||
a. | list its material topics | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>Materiality Identified | |||
b. | report changes to the list of material topics compared to the previous reporting period | Not applicable | |||
3-3 | Management of material topics | ▼ | |||
a. | describe the actual and potential, negative and positive impacts on the economy, environment, and people, including impacts on their human rights | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>KPIs Associated with Materiality and Contribution to SDGs | |||
b. | report whether the organization is involved with the negative impacts through its activities or as a result of its business relationships, and describe the activities or business relationships | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>KPIs Associated with Materiality and Contribution to SDGs | |||
c. | describe its policies or commitments regarding the material topic | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>KPIs Associated with Materiality and Contribution to SDGs | |||
d. | describe actions taken to manage the topic and related impacts, including | ||||
i. | actions to prevent or mitigate potential negative impacts | COMPLIANCE>WHISTLE-BLOWER SYSTEM IN THE PROLOGIS GROUP, SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
ii. | actions to address actual negative impacts, including actions to provide for or cooperate in their remediation | COMPLIANCE>WHISTLE-BLOWER SYSTEM IN THE PROLOGIS GROUP, SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
iii. | actions to manage actual and potential positive impacts | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS | |||
e. | report the following information about tracking the effectiveness of the actions taken | ||||
i. | processes used to track the effectiveness of the actions | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
ii. | goals, targets, and indicators used to evaluate progress | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>KPIs Associated with Materiality and Contribution to SDGs | |||
iii. | the effectiveness of the actions, including progress toward the goals and targets | MATERIALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE SDGS>KPIs Associated with Materiality and Contribution to SDGs | |||
iv. | lessons learned and how these have been incorporated into the organization’s operational policies and procedures | ESG POLICY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM>NPR’S ESG COMMITTEE | |||
f. | describe how engagement with stakeholders has informed the actions taken (3-3-d) and how it has informed whether the actions have been effective (3-3-e) | COMPLIANCE>WHISTLE-BLOWER SYSTEM IN THE PROLOGIS GROUP, SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
Economic performance | |||||
GRI 201: Economic performance 2016 | 201-1 | Direct economic value generated and distributed | ▼ | ||
a. | Direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D) on an accruals basis, including the basic components for the organization’s global operations as listed below. If data are presented on a cash basis, report the justification for this decision in addition to reporting the following basic components |
【Japanese only】Securities Report>Summary of NPR | |||
i. | Direct economic value generated: revenues | 【Japanese only】Securities Report>Summary of NPR | |||
ii. | Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments |
【Japanese only】Securities Report>Summary of NPR ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE |
|||
iii. | Economic value retained: ‘direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’ | 【Japanese only】Securities Report>Summary of NPR | |||
b. | Where significant, report EVG&D separately at country, regional, or market levels, and the criteria used for defining significance | 【Japanese only】Securities Report>Summary of NPR | |||
201-2 | Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change | ▼ | |||
a. | Risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue, or expenditure, including | ||||
i. | a description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other | CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY>Risks and Opportunities and Countermeasures | |||
ii. | a description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity | CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY>Risks and Opportunities and Countermeasures | |||
iii. | the financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken | CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY>Risks and Opportunities and Countermeasures | |||
iv. | the methods used to manage the risk or opportunity | CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY>Risks and Opportunities and Countermeasures | |||
v. | the costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity | CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY>Risks and Opportunities and Countermeasures | |||
201-3 | Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans | ▼ | |||
a. | If the plan’s liabilities are met by the organization’s general resources, the estimated value of those liabilities | There are no defined benefit pension plan contributions or other retirement plans. | |||
b. | If a separate fund exists to pay the plan’s pension liabilities | ||||
i. | the extent to which the scheme’s liabilities are estimated to be covered by the assets that have been set aside to meet them | ||||
ii. | the basis on which that estimate has been arrived at | ||||
iii. | when that estimate was made | ||||
c. | If a fund set up to pay the plan’s pension liabilities is not fully covered, explain the strategy, if any, adopted by the employer to work towards full coverage, and the timescale, if any, by which the employer hopes to achieve full coverage | ||||
d. | Percentage of salary contributed by employee or employer | ||||
e. | Level of participation in retirement plans, such as participation in mandatory or voluntary schemes, regional, or country-based schemes, or those with financial impact | ||||
201-4 | Financial assistance received from government | ▼ | |||
a. | Total monetary value of financial assistance received by the organization from any government during the reporting period, including | There is no financial assistance received from the government. | |||
i. | tax relief and tax credits | ||||
ii. | subsidies | ||||
iii. | investment grants, research and development grants, and other relevant types of grant | ||||
iv. | awards | ||||
v. | royalty holidays | ||||
vi. | financial assistance from Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) | ||||
vii. | financial incentives | ||||
viii. | other financial benefits received or receivable from any government for any operation | ||||
b. | The information in 201-4-a by country | ||||
c. | Whether, and the extent to which, any government is present in the shareholding structure | ||||
Indirect economic impacts | |||||
GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016 | 203-1 | Infrastructure investments and services supported | ▼ | ||
a. | Extent of development of significant infrastructure investments and services supported | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
b. | Current or expected impacts on communities and local economies, including positive and negative impacts where relevant | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
c. | Whether these investments and services are commercial, in-kind, or pro bono engagements | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
203-2 | Significant indirect economic impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | Examples of significant identified indirect economic impacts of the organization, including positive and negative impacts | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
b. | Significance of the indirect economic impacts in the context of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities, such as national and international standards, protocols, and policy agendas | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
Anti-corruption | |||||
GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016 | 205-1 | Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | ▼ | ||
a. | Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | RISK MANAGEMENT>RISK ASSESSMENT | |||
b. | Significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment | No significant risks related to corruption identified. | |||
205-2 | Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures | ▼ | Investment corporations are prohibited from hiring employees under the Japanese Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, therefore we report on employees of Prologis REIT Management K.K., to which we outsource our asset management. | ||
a. | Total number and percentage of governance body members that the organization’s anticorruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by region. | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
b. | Total number and percentage of employees that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by employee category and region | COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT | |||
c. | Total number and percentage of business partners that the organization’s anticorruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by type of business partner and region. Describe if the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to any other persons or organizations | PROLOGIS SUPPLIER CODE OF CONDUCT | |||
d. | Total number and percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by region |
ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT |
|||
e. | Total number and percentage of employees that have received training on anticorruption, broken down by employee category and region |
ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE>PROLOGIS CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT |
|||
205-3 | Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | ▼ | |||
a. | Total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption | There are no serious incidents of corruption. | |||
b. | Total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption | ||||
c. | Total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption | ||||
d. | Public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases | ||||
Anti-competitive behavior | |||||
GRI 206: Anti-competitive Behavior 2016 | 206-1 | Legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices | ▼ | ||
a. | Number of legal actions pending or completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior and violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant | Not applicable | |||
b. | Main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgements | ||||
Energy | |||||
GRI 302: Energy 2016 | 302-1 | Energy consumption within the organization | ▼ | ||
a. | Total fuel consumption within the organization from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used. | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
b. | Total fuel consumption within the organization from renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used. | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
c. | In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total | ||||
i. | electricity consumption | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
ii. | heating consumption | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iii. | cooling consumption | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iv. | steam consumption | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
d. | In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total | ||||
i. | electricity sold | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
ii. | heating sold | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iii. | cooling sold | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iv. | steam sold | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
e. | Total energy consumption within the organization, in joules or multiples | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
f. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
g. | Source of the conversion factors used | Not applicable | |||
302-2 | Energy consumption outside of the organization | ▼ | |||
a. | Energy consumption outside of the organization, in joules or multiples | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
b. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
c. | Source of the conversion factors used | Not applicable | |||
302-3 | Energy intensity | ▼ | |||
a. | Energy intensity ratio for the organization | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
b. | Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio | ESG DATA>ENERGY | |||
c. | Types of energy included in the intensity ratio; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all | This includes all fuel, power, heating, cooling, and steam. | |||
d. | Whether the ratio uses energy consumption within the organization, outside of it, or both. | Calculated including both inside and outside the organization. | |||
302-4 | Reduction of energy consumption | ▼ | |||
a. | Amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives, in joules or multiples | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | Types of energy included in the reductions; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
c. | Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, such as base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
d. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
302-5 | Reductions in energy requirements of products and services | ▼ | |||
a. | Reductions in energy requirements of sold products and services achieved during the reporting period, in joules or multiples | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, such as base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it. | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
c. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
Water and effluents | |||||
GRI 303: Water and Effluents 2018 | 303-1 | Interactions with water as a shared resource | ▼ | ||
a. | A description of how the organization interacts with water, including how and where water is withdrawn, consumed, and discharged, and the water-related impacts the organization has caused or contributed to, or that are directly linked to its operations, products, or services by its business relationships (e.g., impacts caused by runoff) | WATER CONSERVATION>POLICY AND OUR APPROACH | |||
b. | A description of the approach used to identify water-related impacts, including the scope of assessments, their timeframe, and any tools or methodologies used | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
c. | A description of how water-related impacts are addressed, including how the organization works with stakeholders to steward water as a shared resource, and how it engages with suppliers or customers with significant water-related impacts | WATER CONSERVATION>INITIATIVES TOWARDS WATER CONSERVATION | |||
d. | An explanation of the process for setting any water-related goals and targets that are part of the organization’s approach to managing water and effluents, and how they relate to public policy and the local context of each area with water stress | WATER CONSERVATION>INITIATIVES TOWARDS WATER CONSERVATION | |||
303-2 | Management of water discharge-related impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of any minimum standards set for the quality of effluent discharge, and how these minimum standards were determined, including | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | how standards for facilities operating in locations with no local discharge requirements were determined | ||||
ii. | any internally developed water quality standards or guidelines | ||||
iii. | any sector-specific standards considered | ||||
iv. | whether the profile of the receiving waterbody was considered | ||||
303-3 | Water withdrawal | ▼ | |||
a. | Total water withdrawal from all areas in megaliters, and a breakdown of this total by the following sources, if applicable | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | Surface water | ||||
ii. | Ground water | ||||
iii. | Sea water | ||||
iv. | Produced water | ||||
v. | Third-party water | ||||
b. | Total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megaliters, and a breakdown of this total by the following sources, if applicable | There are no business activities in water-stressed areas. | |||
i. | Surface water | ||||
ii. | Ground water | ||||
iii. | Sea water | ||||
iv. | Produced water | ||||
v. | Third-party water, and a breakdown of this total by the withdrawal sources listed in i-iv | ||||
c. | A breakdown of total water withdrawal from each of the sources listed in Disclosures 303-3-a and 303-3-b in megaliters by the following categories | ||||
i. | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
ii. | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
d. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. | ||||
303-4 | Water discharge | ▼ | |||
a. | Total water discharge to all areas in megaliters, and a breakdown of this total by the following types of destination, if applicable | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | Surface water | ||||
ii. | Ground water | ||||
iii. | Sea water | ||||
iv. | Third-party water, and the volume of this total sent for use to other organizations, if applicable. | ||||
b. | A breakdown of total water discharge to all areas in megaliters by the following categories | ||||
i. | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
ii. | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
c. | Total water discharge to all areas with water stress in megaliters, and a breakdown of this total by the following categories | There are no business activities in water-stressed areas. | |||
i. | Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
ii. | Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids) | ||||
d. | Priority substances of concern for which discharges are treated, including | ||||
i. | how priority substances of concern were defined, and any international standard, authoritative list, or criteria used | ||||
ii. | the approach for setting discharge limits for priority substances of concern | ||||
iii. | number of incidents of non-compliance with discharge limits | ||||
e. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. | ||||
303-5 | Water consumption | ▼ | |||
a. | Total water consumption from all areas in megaliters | ESG DATA>WATER | |||
b. | Total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megaliters | There are no business activities in water-stressed areas. | |||
c. | Change in water storage in megaliters, if water storage has been identified as having a significant water-related impact | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
d. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used, including whether the information is calculated, estimated, modeled, or sourced from direct measurements, and the approach taken for this, such as the use of any sector-specific factors | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
Emissions | |||||
GRI 305: Emissions 2016 | 305-1 | Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | ▼ | ||
a. | Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
b. | Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2 , CH4 , N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6 , NF3 , or all | CO2 is included. | |||
c. | Biogenic CO2 emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | Not applicable | |||
d. | Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including | Not applicable | |||
i. | the rationale for choosing it | ||||
ii. | emissions in the base year | ||||
iii. | the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions | ||||
e. | Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
f. | Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
g. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
305-2 | Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | ▼ | |||
a. | Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
b. | If applicable, gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
c. | If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO , CH , N O, HFCs, PFCs, SF , NF , or all | CO2 is included. | |||
d. | Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including | Not applicable | |||
i. | the rationale for choosing it | ||||
ii. | emissions in the base year | ||||
iii. | the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions | ||||
e. | Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
f. | Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
g. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
305-3 | Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | ▼ | |||
a. | Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
b. | If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO , CH , N O, HFCs, PFCs, SF , NF , or all | CO2 is included. | |||
c. | Biogenic CO2 emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | Not applicable | |||
d. | Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions categories and activities included in the calculation | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
e. | Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including | Not applicable | |||
i. | the rationale for choosing it | ||||
ii. | emissions in the base year | ||||
iii. | the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions | ||||
f. | Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
g. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
305-4 | GHG emissions intensity | ▼ | |||
a. | GHG emissions intensity ratio for the organization | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
b. | Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
c. | Types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3) | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
d. | Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2 , CH4 , N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6 , NF3 , or all) | CO2 is included. | |||
305-5 | Reduction of GHG emissions | ▼ | |||
a. | GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives, in metric tons of CO2 equivalent | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
b. | Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2 , CH4 , N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6 , NF3 , or all) | CO2 is included. | |||
c. | Base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it | Not applicable | |||
d. | Scopes in which reductions took place; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3) | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
e. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ESG DATA>CLIMATE CHANGE | |||
305-6 | Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) | ▼ | |||
a. | Production, imports, and exports of ODS in metric tons of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | Substances included in the calculation | ||||
c. | Source of the emission factors used | ||||
d. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ||||
305-7 | Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions | ▼ | |||
a. | Significant air emissions, in kilograms or multiples, for each of the following | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | NOx | ||||
ii. | SOx | ||||
iii. | Persistent organic pollutants (POP) | ||||
iv. | Volatile organic compounds (VOC) | ||||
v. | Hazardous air pollutants (HAP) | ||||
vi. | Particulate matter (PM) | ||||
vii. | Other standard categories of air emissions identified in relevant regulations | ||||
b. | Source of the emission factors used | ||||
c. | Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | ||||
Waste | |||||
GRI 306: Waste 2020 | 306-1 | Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | ▼ | ||
a. | For the organization’s significant actual and potential waste-related impacts, a description of | ||||
i. | the inputs, activities, and outputs that lead or could lead to these impacts | POLLUTION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT>INITIATIVES TOWARDS REDUCING WASTE | |||
ii. | whether these impacts relate to waste generated in the organization’s own activities or to waste generated upstream or downstream in its value chain | There is waste generation throughout the value chain. | |||
306-2 | Management of significant waste-related impacts | ▼ | |||
a. | Actions, including circularity measures, taken to prevent waste generation in the organization’s own activities and upstream and downstream in its value chain, and to manage significant impacts from waste generated | POLLUTION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT>INITIATIVES TOWARDS REDUCING WASTE | |||
b. | If the waste generated by the organization in its own activities is managed by a third party, a description of the processes used to determine whether the third party manages the waste in line with contractual or legislative obligations | There are no applicable initiatives. | |||
c. | The processes used to collect and monitor waste-related data | There are no applicable initiatives. | |||
306-3 | Waste generated | ▼ | |||
a. | Total weight of waste generated in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by composition of the waste | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
b. | Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
306-4 | Waste diverted from disposal | ▼ | |||
a. | Total weight of waste diverted from disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by composition of the waste | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
b. | Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | There are no hazardous waste that were not disposed of. | |||
i. | Preparation for reuse | ||||
ii. | Recycling | ||||
iii. | Other recovery operations | ||||
c. | Total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | ||||
i. | Preparation for reuse | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
ii. | Recycling | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
iii. | Other recovery operations | Not applicable | |||
d. | For each recovery operation listed in Disclosures 306-4-b and 306-4-c, a breakdown of the total weight in metric tons of hazardous waste and of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | onsite | ||||
ii. | offsite | ||||
e. | Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
306-5 | Waste directed to disposal | ▼ | |||
a. | Total weight of waste directed to disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by composition of the waste | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
b. | Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by the following disposal operations | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | Incineration (with energy recovery) | ||||
ii. | Incineration (without energy recovery) | ||||
iii. | Landfilling | ||||
iv. | Other disposal operations | ||||
c. | Total weight of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal in metric tons, and a breakdown of this total by the following disposal operations | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | Incineration (with energy recovery) | ||||
ii. | Incineration (without energy recovery) | ||||
iii. | Landfilling | ||||
iv. | Other disposal operations | ||||
d. | For each disposal operation listed in Disclosures 306-5-b and 306-5-c, a breakdown of the total weight in metric tons of hazardous waste and of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | onsite | ||||
ii. | offsite | ||||
e. | Contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled | ESG DATA>WASTE | |||
Supplier environmental assessment | |||||
GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016 | 308-1 | New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | ▼ | ||
a. | Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | FOR BUSINESS PARTNERS | |||
308-2 | Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | ▼ | |||
a. | Number of suppliers assessed for environmental impacts | FOR BUSINESS PARTNERS>Supply Chain Risk Management | |||
b. | Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts | No suppliers were identified as having a significant negative environmental impact. | |||
c. | Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts identified in the supply chain | No significant negative environmental impact. | |||
d. | Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment | ||||
e. | Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why | ||||
Employment | |||||
GRI 401: Employment 2016 | 401-1 | New employee hires and employee turnover | ▼ | ||
a. | Total number and rate of new employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
b. | Total number and rate of employee turnover during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
401-2 | Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees | ▼ | |||
a. | Benefits which are standard for full-time employees of the organization but are not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by significant locations of operation. These include, as a minimum | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | life insurance | ||||
ii. | health care | ||||
iii. | disability and invalidity coverage | ||||
iv. | parental leave | ||||
v. | retirement provision | ||||
vi. | stock ownership | ||||
vii. | others | ||||
b. | The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Not applicable | |||
401-3 | parental leave | ▼ | |||
a. | Total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave, by gender | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
b. | Total number of employees that took parental leave, by gender | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
c. | Total number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended, by gender | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
d. | Total number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
e. | Return to work and retention rates of employees that took parental leave, by gender | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
Occupational health and safety | |||||
GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 | 403-1 | Occupational health and safety management system | ▼ | ||
a. | A statement of whether an occupational health and safety management system has been implemented, including whether | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | the system has been implemented because of legal requirements and, if so, a list of the requirements | ||||
ii. | the system has been implemented based on recognized risk management and/or management system standards/guidelines and, if so, a list of the standards/guidelines | ||||
b. | A description of the scope of workers, activities, and workplaces covered by the occupational health and safety management system, and an explanation of whether and, if so, why any workers, activities, or workplaces are not covered | ||||
403-2 | Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of the processes used to identify work-related hazards and assess risks on a routine and non-routine basis, and to apply the hierarchy of controls in order to eliminate hazards and minimize risks, including | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
i. | how the organization ensures the quality of these processes, including the competency of persons who carry them out | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
ii. | how the results of these processes are used to evaluate and continually improve the occupational health and safety management system | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
b. | A description of the processes for workers to report work-related hazards and hazardous situations, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
c. | A description of the policies and processes for workers to remove themselves from work situations that they believe could cause injury or ill health, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
d. | A description of the processes used to investigate work-related incidents, including the processes to identify hazards and assess risks relating to the incidents, to determine corrective actions using the hierarchy of controls, and to determine improvements needed in the occupational health and safety management system | RISK MANAGEMENT>EMERGING RISKS AND MEASURES IN NPR’S BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT | |||
403-3 | Occupational health services | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of the occupational health services’ functions that contribute to the identification and elimination of hazards and minimization of risks, and an explanation of how the organization ensures the quality of these services and facilitates workers’ access to them | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
403-4 | Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of the processes for worker participation and consultation in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the occupational health and safety management system, and for providing access to and communicating relevant information on occupational health and safety to workers | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | Where formal joint management-worker health and safety committees exist, a description of their responsibilities, meeting frequency, decision-making authority, and whether and, if so, why any workers are not represented by these committees | ||||
403-5 | Worker training on occupational health and safety | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of any occupational health and safety training provided to workers, including generic training as well as training on specific work-related hazards, hazardous activities, or hazardous situations | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
403-6 | Promotion of worker health | ▼ | |||
a. | An explanation of how the organization facilitates workers’ access to non-occupational medical and healthcare services, and the scope of access provided |
【Japanese only】Health Management Initiatives Investment corporations are prohibited from hiring employees under the Japanese Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations, and the employees of Prologis REIT Management K.K., to which the asset management is outsourced, are seconded from Prologis Japan. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION>Certified Health and Productivity Management Outstanding Organizations |
|||
b. | A description of any voluntary health promotion services and programs offered to workers to address major non-work-related health risks, including the specific health risks addressed, and how the organization facilitates workers’ access to these services and programs | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
403-7 | Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships | ▼ | |||
a. | A description of the organization’s approach to preventing or mitigating significant negative occupational health and safety impacts that are directly linked to its operations, products, or services by its business relationships, and the related hazards and risks | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
403-8 | Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | ▼ | |||
a. | If the organization has implemented an occupational health and safety management system based on legal requirements and/or recognized standards/guidelines | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system | ||||
ii. | the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system that has been internally audited | ||||
iii. | the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system that has been audited or certified by an external party | ||||
b. | Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded | ||||
c. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. | ||||
403-9 | Work-related injuries | ▼ | |||
a. | For all employees | ||||
i. | The number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
ii. | The number and rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
iii. | The number and rate of recordable work-related injuries | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
iv. | The main types of work-related injury | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
v. | The number of hours worked | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | For all workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | The number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | ||||
ii. | The number and rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | ||||
iii. | The number and rate of recordable work-related injuries | ||||
iv. | The main types of work-related injury | ||||
v. | The number of hours worked | ||||
c. | The work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury, including | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | how these hazards have been determined | ||||
ii. | which of these hazards have caused or contributed to high-consequence injuries during the reporting period | ||||
iii. | actions taken or underway to eliminate these hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | ||||
d. | Any actions taken or underway to eliminate other work-related hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
e. | Whether the rates have been calculated based on 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours worked | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
f. | Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
g. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
403-10 | Work-related ill health | ▼ | |||
a. | For all employees | ||||
i. | The number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
ii. | The number of cases of recordable work-related ill health | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
iii. | The main types of work-related ill health | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
b. | For all workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | The number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health | ||||
ii. | The number of cases of recordable work-related ill health | ||||
iii. | The main types of work-related ill health | ||||
c. | The work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health, including | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
i. | how these hazards have been determined | ||||
ii. | which of these hazards have caused or contributed to cases of ill health during the reporting period | ||||
iii. | actions taken or underway to eliminate these hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | ||||
d. | Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
e. | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. | ESG DATA>OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH | |||
Training and education | |||||
GRI 404: Training and education 2016 | 404-1 | Average hours of training per year per employee | ▼ | ||
a. | Average hours of training that the organization’s employees have undertaken during the reporting period, by | ESG DATA>HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | |||
i. | gender | The number of hours per gender is not disclosed. | |||
ii. | employee category | The number of hours by employee category is not disclosed. | |||
404-2 | Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | ▼ | |||
a. | Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills | FOR EMPLOYEES>INVESTING IN PEOPLE THROUGH TRAINING | |||
b. | Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employmen | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
404-3 | Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews | ▼ | |||
a. | Percentage of total employees by gender and by employee category who received a regular performance and career development review during the reporting period | FOR EMPLOYEES>Performance appraisals and feedback process | |||
Diversity and equal opportunity | |||||
GRI 405: Diversity and equal opportunity 2016 | 405-1 | Diversity of governance bodies and employees | ▼ | ||
a. | Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories | ||||
i. | gender | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
ii. | Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iii. | Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups) | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE>Executive, Supervisory Directors and Board of Directors | |||
b. | Percentage of employees per employee category in each of the following diversity categories | ||||
i. | gender | ESG DATA>EMPLOYEE | |||
ii. | Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
iii. | Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups) | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
405-2 | Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men | ▼ | |||
a. | Ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation | There is no difference in basic salary and remuneration by gender. | |||
b. | The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation' | ||||
Non-discrimination | |||||
GRI 406: Non-discrimination 2016 | 406-1 | Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken | ▼ | ||
a. | Total number of incidents of discrimination during the reporting period | There are no incidents of discrimination. | |||
b. | Status of the incidents and actions taken with reference to the following | ||||
i. | Incident reviewed by the organization | ||||
ii. | Remediation plans being implemented | ||||
iii. | Remediation plans that have been implemented, with results reviewed through routine internal management review processes | ||||
iv. | Incident no longer subject to action | ||||
Local communities | |||||
GRI 413: Local communities 2016 | 413-1 | Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs | ▼ | ||
a. | Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and/or development programs, including the use of | ||||
i. | social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
ii. | environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring | ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY>Environmental Assessments | |||
iii. | public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
iv. | local community development programs based on local communities’ needs | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
v. | stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping | RESPONSIBILITY FOR STAKEHOLDERS | |||
vi. | broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups | FOR COMMUNITIES | |||
vii. | works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts | Disclosure unavailable at present. | |||
viii. | formal local community grievance processes | COMPLIANCE>SAFETY HELPLINE | |||
413-2 | Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | ▼ | |||
a. | Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities, including | Not applicable | |||
i. | the location of the operations | ||||
ii. | the significant actual and potential negative impacts of operations | ||||
Supplier social assessment | |||||
GRI 414: Supplier social assessment 2016 | 414-1 | New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | ▼ | ||
a. | Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria | HUMAN RIGHTS>HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENT | |||
414-2 | Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | ▼ | |||
a. | Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts | Not applicable | |||
b. | Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts | ||||
c. | Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain | ||||
d. | Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment | ||||
e. | Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why | ||||
Public policy | |||||
GRI 415: Public policy 2016 | 415-1 | Political contributions | ▼ | ||
a. | Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary | ESG DATA>COMPLIANCE | |||
b. | If applicable, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated | Not applicable | |||
Customer health and safety | |||||
GRI 416: Customer health and safety 2016 | 416-1 | Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and service categories | ▼ | ||
a. | Percentage of significant product and service categories for which health and safety impacts are assessed for improvement | NPR conducts on-site inspections for all properties in its portfolio in the first, second, and tenth years after completion. NPR makes necessary repairs for any defects or deterioration identified on the periodic inspections. | |||
416-2 | Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services | ▼ | |||
a. | Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services within the reporting period, by | There are no incidents of non-compliance. | |||
i. | incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a fine or penalty | ||||
ii. | incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a warning | ||||
iii. | incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes | ||||
b. | If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient | There are no incidents of non-compliance. |